For the Birds: Questioning some ‘wisdom’ in a birding article

Photo by Chris Bosak A Rose-breasted Grosbeak visits a feeder in Danbury, Conn., May 2016.
Photo by Chris Bosak
A Rose-breasted Grosbeak visits a feeder in Danbury, Conn., May 2016. By not feeding birds, people will miss out on scenes like this.

Here’s my cynical take on a bird article printed on the website of a national nonprofit agency whose mission has nothing to do with birds. I won’t reveal the agency to protect the innocent.

The headline grabbed my attention, which is what headlines are supposed to do, I guess. It read: 7 Reasons to Think Twice Before Getting a Bird-feeder.

Right away, I knew I wouldn’t like the article, but I figured I would read it anyway and at least give it a chance. I was right, of course, but at least I can say I gave it a fair shot.

The article makes some good points, but, in my opinion, it misses the mark for the most part. It basically picks apart the hobby of feeding birds and outlines every possible negative scenario.

It’s like saying you should avoid building model airplanes because you might get glue on your fingers. Well, of course, you might, but you take precautions so that doesn’t happen, and if it does, then you wash your hands.

Or, you should avoid gardening because it might make your back ache, or you might dig up some insects that are scary-looking. Well, if your back starts to hurt, then stop for a while. If you see a scary insect, get over it because you know that’s inherent to the hobby.

Anyway, here are the seven reasons why this article urges you to think twice about feeding birds. I will make my cynical comments after each one.

1. Bird feeders are messy. Birds flick seeds on the ground and leave behind remnants of the seeds they do eat. 

No kidding. Clean up the seeds and shells under the feeder if you don’t want to look at them. 

2. There’s a lot of upkeep. Bird feeders need to be kept clean just like our dishes and utensils. 

I agree that they need to be kept clean to prevent the spread of disease. The article recommends cleaning them with a 10% bleach to 90% water solution every 7 to ten days. To me, that doesn’t seem like such an onerous task that it would make me think twice about getting a bird feeder and miss out on the enjoyment it brings. 

3. They can be pricey.

Yes, it can be pricey. But it doesn’t have to be. You don’t have to buy the most expensive feeders and seeds. I think everyone knows that they should spend what they feel comfortable with. Nyjer seeds are expensive, so I don’t buy them often. Instead, I buy less expensive types of seeds like black oil sunflower. Don’t skimp too much, though, and buy the cheap seed mixes that only sparrows like.

4. Sick birds can infect one another.

True, but regular cleaning, which has already been covered in number 2, can help diminish the possibility. Also, pandemic-like outbreaks among wild birds are rare. A few years ago, several bird and conservation groups recommended pausing bird feeding because of an outbreak. That’s the first time I can remember that happening in my lifetime. To me, it’s like saying people shouldn’t ever go to concerts or amusement parks or the grocery store because someone might be sick and infect everyone. 

5. Bird feeders attract unwanted critters. Squirrels, chipmunks and raccoons are also attracted to feeders, and rats and mice may get into your seed supply.

Again, for me, the rewards of bird feeding far outweigh the occasional run-in with these critters. Squirrels and chipmunks can be really annoying, but they are basically harmless and can actually be fun to watch sometimes. My worst experience came when I left a bag of sunflower seeds in my three-season porch, and pantry moths got in. That was not a fun experience, to say the least, but I learned from it and didn’t do that again. Bears, which the article does not mention, are another legitimate concern, depending on where one lives, but winter bird feeding is still a possibility.

6. They bring health concerns. Bird feeders can spread disease and even cause an increase in ticks in the area as they fall off the birds. 

This is basically a repeat of numbers 2 and 4. Again, keep the feeders clean. As far as ticks are concerned, I’ve never heard that before and am skeptical about that assertion. 

7. They can harm local wildlife. Birds can crash into windows if the feeders are not placed properly and non-native species like starlings are attracted to feeders.

Well, starlings don’t need bird feeders to be a nuisance. I’ve seen plenty of starlings in places without feeders. And, yes, it is recommended that feeders be placed within three feet or more than 30 feet of windows to avoid strikes.

The article seemingly attempts to throw cold water on a hobby enjoyed by more than 50 million people, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. To me, the reasons are flimsy at best. It takes worst-case scenarios and tries to paint them as regular occurrences. 

I could get hit by a bus tomorrow, but that doesn’t mean I’m never going to leave the house. Yes, bird feeding does carry some responsibility and expense and does take some effort, but it’s one hundred percent worth it. The only thing I’m thinking twice about is visiting that website again. 

For the Birds: Spring waterfowl migration never disappoints

Photo by Chris Bosak – A male common merganser swims on a small pond in New England.

There is a pond 20 minutes from my house that I pass frequently. For 50 weeks of the year, the pond holds little interest for me other than being an aesthetically pleasing landmark to look at as I drive past.

In the summer, a few mallards and Canada geese are the only birds present. It being a small pond in New England, it is frozen for most of the winter, which is great for the skaters who have fun on the ice, but not so much for birdwatchers.

However, during one week in early spring and one week in late fall, the pond holds a surprisingly solid variety of migrating ducks. 

The other day when I drove past, I noticed a bunch of white blobs in the water, and, even at 40 mph, I knew just what they were.

I pulled over at the closest spot where it was safe to do so and turned the car around. From a spot along the road about 30 yards from the pond’s edge, I was able to confirm that indeed they were common mergansers. For a small pond, it held quite a few of the large waterfowl. Common mergansers happen to be one of my favorite birds, so I lingered at that spot along the road for close to an hour watching them.

In previous years, I have seen hooded mergansers perform their courtship display on this pond. To my delight, the common mergansers were doing their courtship display on this day.

Also to my pleasant surprise, the mergansers were not the only duck species on the pond. As I was watching the mergansers dive and resurface, a small group of ring-necked ducks came over to join the party. They did not stay long among the common mergansers but rather silently floated to the other side of the pond. As I followed the ring-necked ducks’ path through my binoculars, I spotted a pair of gadwall on the opposite edge of the pond as well. A few mallards and Canada geese rounded out the fowl sightings.

It was a pleasant hour spent at the pond, especially considering a busy road runs adjacent to one long edge of the pond and the other edge is a residential area. My parking spot was along the residential road.

Yet another pleasing moment of this unexpected birding experience came in the form of a songbird. I had turned off my radio so as to not spook the mergansers away from the pond’s edge. Instead of listening to old songs I’ve heard hundreds of times before or some divisive news channel, I was treated to the sounds of a northern mockingbird showing off his repertoire from a nearby perch. At first, I thought it was an eastern phoebe, but that was just the first mimicked song I heard from the mocker.

I love the spring waterfowl migration. It serves as a link between the early songbird migrants, such as red-winged blackbirds and eastern phoebes, and the multitude of other birds that follow. While the spring waterfowl migration is somewhat predictable (look at just about any unfrozen body of water and you’ll see ducks of some sort), it is fleeting. Ducks and other fowl feel a sense of urgency to get to their northern breeding grounds, and they tend not to linger too long on their migratory stopover spots.

Depending on your location, the variety of waterfowl that pass through New England (and some stay, of course) is pretty impressive. Some of my favorites include common merganser, hooded merganser, northern pintail, northern shoveler, bufflehead and common goldeneye.

The trick is getting out there as often as possible during these few weeks when they are passing through. The other trick is to check all open water. Migrating ducks often end up in unexpected places such as swelled roadside ditches, fast-moving streams, and, of course, small ponds along busy roads.

For the Birds: Phoebes are back, spring is not far behind

Photo by Chris Bosak
Eastern phoebes are one of the first migrants to return to New England in the spring.

The bird world is amazing. If you’re reading this column, you likely already know that, but every once in a while something reminds me of just how incredible birds really are.

The other day, March 11 to be exact, I heard the song I’ve been waiting to hear for months: the unmistakable two-syllable song of the eastern phoebe. Like many birds, phoebes say their name, a raspy “fee-bee.”

I turned my head toward the song and instantly saw the smallish songbird perched on a telephone wire. Of course, the bird was bobbing its tail as phoebes almost always do.

It was the first phoebe I saw this year, or my FOY (first of year) phoebe in birding lingo. It came on one of the unseasonably warm days we had, and I wasn’t overly surprised to see the bird. Still, it seemed a bit early for the phoebe to be back in New England, so I checked my eBird account to see when I saw my FOY last year.

Sure enough, it was March 11. The first phoebe I saw occurred on the same exact calendar day as last year. In October of last year, this bird left New England for southern U.S. or Mexico. Sometime in February it began its journey back north and arrived at my place of work on the same day as last year. Of course, I can’t tell with all certainty it’s the same bird, but I’d like to think so.

Continue reading

For the Birds: Finally, a column on old bird names

Photo by Chris Bosak
The eastern towhee used to be called chewink.

Many months ago, or maybe it was years at this point, I promised to do a column on old bird names. 

Quite frankly, I forgot about it and never got around to doing the column. I can’t even remember what inspired me to consider such a column, but I must have been writing about a bird with a relatively new name and thought it would be a good idea to look at other somewhat recent bird name changes. Perhaps I wrote about a long-tailed duck and recalled the old name of oldsquaw. Regardless of the impetus, here’s that column I promised so long ago.

Now, I did write a column last summer about the most recent name changes by the American Ornithological Society. In that column, I relayed that the powers that be changed the name of the house wren we see in New England to northern house wren. A year earlier, I wrote that the three redpoll species were lumped into a single species called redpoll. 

Continue reading

For the Birds: As it turns out, birds and birders are smart

Photo by Chris Bosak
Snow gathers on a blue jay’s face during a snowstorm, January 25, 2026, New England. Blue jays, like all corvids, are highly intelligent.

We’ve all heard the expression “birdbrain” to describe someone lacking intelligence or prone to doing dumb things. The definition that pops up when doing an internet search is “a silly or stupid person.”

Birdbrain, of course, is a misnomer because birds are actually very smart.

While everyone has heard of birdbrain, how about birderbrain? I’d be willing to bet not many people have heard that one before. That would be understandable because I just made up the expression for this column.

Continue reading

For the Birds: Mixed blackbird flock points to spring ahead

Photo by Chris Bosak
A female red-winged blackbird perches in a tree.

As far as I’m concerned, it’s never too early to talk about signs of spring.

Not that I’m rushing winter. There is plenty to do in winter, and I appreciate all of New England’s seasons for what they offer birdwatchers. But when a sign of spring presents itself, even with several inches of snow still on the ground, it’s hard to ignore.

Unlike plants that may be popping up through the ground but remain unseen due to the snow, birds offer visible and reliable signs of spring. The other day, as soon as I started my walk, I spied several birds flying overhead. In the distance, I heard the familiar and unmistakable songs of red-winged blackbirds.

Continue reading

For the Birds: Bird sighting sparks memory of the past

Photo by Chris Bosak A common merganser swims in a pond in Danbury, Conn., March 2019.

When you have done something for so long, sometimes it is hard to remember what it was like at the beginning. The other day, however, I came across a scene that reminded me of one of my early birdwatching experiences.

The recent prolonged cold spell we endured froze or kept frozen most of the water throughout the region. That makes for a great time to check the areas where water does not freeze, such as dams or fast-moving streams. 

I drive past a large dam frequently and always look at the bottom where the water is constantly flowing. I do this especially during the winter to see if any ducks are gathered in the open water. In the right season and under the right conditions, there are usually several common mergansers in the pool created by the flowing water. 

Continue reading

For the Birds: Deep snow, cold not a great scenario for birds

Photo by Chris Bosak
American goldfinch eats seeds from a spent flower in New England, January 2026.

A ton of snow followed by prolonged freezing temperatures can spell disaster for birds. Luckily, birds have developed several survival strategies to cope with such conditions.

There are several factors at play in these conditions. I will focus mostly on finding food but will address some of the others quickly. 

First, there is the cold. Birds survive freezing temperatures through adaptations that conserve heat and energy. Feathers provide excellent insulation, and many birds maximize this by fluffing their feathers to trap warm air close to their bodies. Birds also have a high metabolic rate, which is fueled by energy-rich foods such as seeds and fat commonly found at feeders. 

Continue reading

For the Birds: Sapsucker make surprise winter visit

Photo by Chris Bosak – A young yellow-bellied sapsucker visits a suet feeder in New England, January 2026.

At first it looked like a growth on the tall bush near my bird feeding station. I quickly realized it wasn’t a growth at all but rather a yellow-bellied sapsucker hugging a small branch. 

It was a first-year bird, and its dark coloration, lack of red head or throat, and barred plumage made it look like part of the bush. It also caught me by surprise because yellow-bellied sapsuckers are migratory and are not frequent visitors to feeders. It was also perfectly still for several minutes as, from the comfort of my living room, I watched it brave the single-digit temperatures.

Continue reading

Howling at the moon

Photo by Chris Bosak- The statue wolves howling at the moon at Huntington State Park, Redding, CT, January, 2026.

The main entrance to Huntington State Park in Redding, Connecticut, features really cool statues of wolves and a bear.

I had only my phone camera with me last evening, but I couldn’t resist taking this photo at dusk of the wolves seemingly howling at the moon.