Photo by Chris Bosak A male piping plover (back) pursues a female at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.
I took a trip to the Connecticut Audubon Society Coastal Center at Milford Point today to see piping plovers, American oystercatchers, and whatever else may be around. I timed it nicely, as I found several piping plover pairs doing their mating ritual and even saw one pair copulating.
The male plovers followed the females around the rocks and sand, standing tall and performing a type of stomp dance with their feet and legs. It was quite entertaining.
While the plovers and oystercatchers were the highlight, there were dozens (hundreds maybe) of brant still hanging around New England.
Photo by Chris Bosak A male piping plover (back) pursues a female at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.Photo by Chris Bosak A male piping plover (back) pursues a female at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.Photo by Chris Bosak Piping plovers copulate at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.Photo by Chris Bosak Piping plovers copulate at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.Photo by Chris Bosak Piping plovers copulate at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.Photo by Chris Bosak American oystercatcher pair at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.Photo by Chris Bosak Brant at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.Photo by Chris Bosak A male piping plover (back) pursues a female at Milford Point in New England, April 16, 2026.
Photo by Chris Bosak Monarch, Brookfield, CT, summer 2019.
Too often, the perils facing a species in serious decline rise to the top of our consciousness through extensive media coverage or other means only to fade into the backs of our minds over time.
Is progress being made to help the species? Has the decline worsened, gotten better or stayed the same?
Here is a look at a few species in peril that were all over the media years ago, but not so much in recent years.
Remember when monarch butterflies were believed to be going extinct and had only a few years left? That news took on a life of its own in the mid-2010s due to a catastrophic population collapse caused mainly by habitat loss.
It turns out the apocalyptic predictions may not have been right, but the species is far from out of the woods. The latest reports show short-term improvement but significant long-term declines.
The World Wildlife Fund last month published an article entitled “Monarch butterfly population increases by 64 percent.” The article states that the population increase is buoyed by a reduction in forest degradation of their winter habitat.
While that is definitely good news, I’m slightly skeptical about how they obtained the 64 percent number. Scientists do not actually count or estimate the number of butterflies they see (that would be nearly impossible to do) but rather monitor how many acres of forest have monarch colonies in their winter range. In 2026, 7.24 acres were inhabited by monarchs compared to 4.42 acres last year.
Again, good news for sure, but the long-term decline is still grim considering they covered 45 acres just 30 years ago, according to the WWF. Hopefully, this short-term increase trend continues.
What about honey bees? Remember how the media told us we were all going to starve because honey bees were disappearing? Indeed, Colony Collapse Disorder in the mid-2000s wiped out about 30 percent of the honey bee colonies, and those losses continue today in some areas due to factors such as mite infestation, pesticides, and habitat loss.
The panic over the loss of honey bees created a surge in home beekeeping, which has helped keep overall population numbers relatively stable. Unfortunately, recent years have seen an uptick in bee colony mortality, with 2025 being one of the worst years yet.
Extinction is not imminent, but all bees, either wild or part of a managed colony, should remain in the public consciousness as the consequences of a bee-less world are severe.
Bats are another animal that received a lot of concern due to a precipitous decline. The panic was warranted as some species were nearly completely wiped out by white-nose syndrome that came to New Hampshire in 2009. Similar to the monarchs and honey bees, bats seem to be making a slow comeback.
Despite the recent success, historic numbers are still concerning. Caves that used to house thousands of bats now have hundreds. According to a University of New Hampshire report last month, one bat survey counted more than 3,000 bats in 2009 and only 16 in 2011. That’s how quick and devastating the fungus was. In 2022, the number was up to 700.
Next week, I’ll look at a decline that is near and dear to my heart. Ever since I saw my first moose in the early 1990s, they have been my favorite animal at times bordering on obsession. Sadly, their numbers took a huge hit in recent years. Are they making a comeback, or are they still struggling?
Photo by Chris Bosak A Rose-breasted Grosbeak visits a feeder in Danbury, Conn., May 2016. By not feeding birds, people will miss out on scenes like this.
Here’s my cynical take on a bird article printed on the website of a national nonprofit agency whose mission has nothing to do with birds. I won’t reveal the agency to protect the innocent.
The headline grabbed my attention, which is what headlines are supposed to do, I guess. It read: 7 Reasons to Think Twice Before Getting a Bird-feeder.
Right away, I knew I wouldn’t like the article, but I figured I would read it anyway and at least give it a chance. I was right, of course, but at least I can say I gave it a fair shot.
The article makes some good points, but, in my opinion, it misses the mark for the most part. It basically picks apart the hobby of feeding birds and outlines every possible negative scenario.
It’s like saying you should avoid building model airplanes because you might get glue on your fingers. Well, of course, you might, but you take precautions so that doesn’t happen, and if it does, then you wash your hands.
Or, you should avoid gardening because it might make your back ache, or you might dig up some insects that are scary-looking. Well, if your back starts to hurt, then stop for a while. If you see a scary insect, get over it because you know that’s inherent to the hobby.
Anyway, here are the seven reasons why this article urges you to think twice about feeding birds. I will make my cynical comments after each one.
1. Bird feeders are messy. Birds flick seeds on the ground and leave behind remnants of the seeds they do eat.
No kidding. Clean up the seeds and shells under the feeder if you don’t want to look at them.
2. There’s a lot of upkeep. Bird feeders need to be kept clean just like our dishes and utensils.
I agree that they need to be kept clean to prevent the spread of disease. The article recommends cleaning them with a 10% bleach to 90% water solution every 7 to ten days. To me, that doesn’t seem like such an onerous task that it would make me think twice about getting a bird feeder and miss out on the enjoyment it brings.
3. They can be pricey.
Yes, it can be pricey. But it doesn’t have to be. You don’t have to buy the most expensive feeders and seeds. I think everyone knows that they should spend what they feel comfortable with. Nyjer seeds are expensive, so I don’t buy them often. Instead, I buy less expensive types of seeds like black oil sunflower. Don’t skimp too much, though, and buy the cheap seed mixes that only sparrows like.
4. Sick birds can infect one another.
True, but regular cleaning, which has already been covered in number 2, can help diminish the possibility. Also, pandemic-like outbreaks among wild birds are rare. A few years ago, several bird and conservation groups recommended pausing bird feeding because of an outbreak. That’s the first time I can remember that happening in my lifetime. To me, it’s like saying people shouldn’t ever go to concerts or amusement parks or the grocery store because someone might be sick and infect everyone.
5. Bird feeders attract unwanted critters. Squirrels, chipmunks and raccoons are also attracted to feeders, and rats and mice may get into your seed supply.
Again, for me, the rewards of bird feeding far outweigh the occasional run-in with these critters. Squirrels and chipmunks can be really annoying, but they are basically harmless and can actually be fun to watch sometimes. My worst experience came when I left a bag of sunflower seeds in my three-season porch, and pantry moths got in. That was not a fun experience, to say the least, but I learned from it and didn’t do that again. Bears, which the article does not mention, are another legitimate concern, depending on where one lives, but winter bird feeding is still a possibility.
6. They bring health concerns. Bird feeders can spread disease and even cause an increase in ticks in the area as they fall off the birds.
This is basically a repeat of numbers 2 and 4. Again, keep the feeders clean. As far as ticks are concerned, I’ve never heard that before and am skeptical about that assertion.
7. They can harm local wildlife. Birds can crash into windows if the feeders are not placed properly and non-native species like starlings are attracted to feeders.
Well, starlings don’t need bird feeders to be a nuisance. I’ve seen plenty of starlings in places without feeders. And, yes, it is recommended that feeders be placed within three feet or more than 30 feet of windows to avoid strikes.
The article seemingly attempts to throw cold water on a hobby enjoyed by more than 50 million people, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. To me, the reasons are flimsy at best. It takes worst-case scenarios and tries to paint them as regular occurrences.
I could get hit by a bus tomorrow, but that doesn’t mean I’m never going to leave the house. Yes, bird feeding does carry some responsibility and expense and does take some effort, but it’s one hundred percent worth it. The only thing I’m thinking twice about is visiting that website again.
Photo by Chris Bosak Eastern phoebes are one of the first migrants to return to New England in the spring.
The bird world is amazing. If you’re reading this column, you likely already know that, but every once in a while something reminds me of just how incredible birds really are.
The other day, March 11 to be exact, I heard the song I’ve been waiting to hear for months: the unmistakable two-syllable song of the eastern phoebe. Like many birds, phoebes say their name, a raspy “fee-bee.”
I turned my head toward the song and instantly saw the smallish songbird perched on a telephone wire. Of course, the bird was bobbing its tail as phoebes almost always do.
It was the first phoebe I saw this year, or my FOY (first of year) phoebe in birding lingo. It came on one of the unseasonably warm days we had, and I wasn’t overly surprised to see the bird. Still, it seemed a bit early for the phoebe to be back in New England, so I checked my eBird account to see when I saw my FOY last year.
Sure enough, it was March 11. The first phoebe I saw occurred on the same exact calendar day as last year. In October of last year, this bird left New England for southern U.S. or Mexico. Sometime in February it began its journey back north and arrived at my place of work on the same day as last year. Of course, I can’t tell with all certainty it’s the same bird, but I’d like to think so.
Photo by Chris Bosak Snow gathers on a blue jay’s face during a snowstorm, January 25, 2026, New England. Blue jays, like all corvids, are highly intelligent.
We’ve all heard the expression “birdbrain” to describe someone lacking intelligence or prone to doing dumb things. The definition that pops up when doing an internet search is “a silly or stupid person.”
Birdbrain, of course, is a misnomer because birds are actually very smart.
While everyone has heard of birdbrain, how about birderbrain? I’d be willing to bet not many people have heard that one before. That would be understandable because I just made up the expression for this column.
Photo by Chris Bosak American goldfinch eats seeds from a spent flower in New England, January 2026.
A ton of snow followed by prolonged freezing temperatures can spell disaster for birds. Luckily, birds have developed several survival strategies to cope with such conditions.
There are several factors at play in these conditions. I will focus mostly on finding food but will address some of the others quickly.
First, there is the cold. Birds survive freezing temperatures through adaptations that conserve heat and energy. Feathers provide excellent insulation, and many birds maximize this by fluffing their feathers to trap warm air close to their bodies. Birds also have a high metabolic rate, which is fueled by energy-rich foods such as seeds and fat commonly found at feeders.
Photo by Chris Bosak A red-shouldered hawk perches on a branch during a snowy day in New England, January 2026.
It should come as no surprise that birdwatching is growing in popularity, according to several studies and other metrics. It had been gaining in popularity for years, but the pandemic greatly accelerated the movement.
As I researched the Great Backyard Bird Count for this column, I was surprised at how much birdwatching had gained in popularity, at least as it is measured by the number of GBBC participants.
Photo by Chris Bosak A northern flicker sips from a birdbath in New England, fall 2025.
I looked out and saw that the water in the birdbath was a solid block of ice. I poured in enough warm water that the ice broke free, so I tossed the frozen block onto the ground and filled the bath with warm water. Within 10 minutes, a northern flicker arrived and took a few sips. What a design on this bird.
Photo by Chris Bosak – A dark-eyed junco eats goldenrod seeds at Huntington State Park in Redding, Connecticut, November 2025.
Here are a few more photos of my experience with juncos in the goldenrod field recently. See the last “For the Birds” column for the whole story. On a side note, now you know what goldenrod looks like after the yellow flowers die off.
Thanks for your support of Birds of New England.com.